ECC vs deepseek-harness

Real adoption data from 325 days of tracking. Updated 2026-10-02.

⚡

Quick Take

deepseek-harness is growing faster (+2.7% vs +1.4%)

Based on 325 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 2.7% weekly growth.

📊 Head to Head

Total Stars
⭐ 270.9k
⭐ 242.1k
Growth Rate
↑1.4%
↑2.7%
Stars Gained
+84.1k
+139.9k

📈 Star Growth Over Time

Based on 325 days of RepoPi snapshots

● ECC ● deepseek-harness

🔍 At a Glance

ECC
deepseek-harness
Language
JavaScript
TypeScript
Stars
270.9k
242.1k
Growth (325d)
+45.0%
+136.9%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, anthropic, claude
ai-agents, cordis, dsh

Choose ECC when...

  • You work primarily in the JavaScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, anthropic capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (270.9k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+45.0% tracked growth)
Full ECC analysis →

Choose deepseek-harness when...

  • You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
  • You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
  • You value a large, active community (242.1k+ stars)
  • You prefer a project with proven momentum (+136.9% tracked growth)
Full deepseek-harness analysis →