deepseek-harness vs AutoGPT
Real adoption data from 297 days of tracking. Updated 2026-09-04.
Quick Take
deepseek-harness is growing faster (+4.9% vs +0.1%)
Based on 297 days of tracking, deepseek-harness shows stronger momentum with 4.9% weekly growth.
📊 Head to Head
Total Stars
Growth Rate
Stars Gained
📈 Star Growth Over Time
Based on 297 days of RepoPi snapshots
● deepseek-harness
● AutoGPT
🔍 At a Glance
deepseek-harness
AutoGPT
Language
TypeScript
Python
Stars
211.8k
187.1k
Growth (297d)
+107.2%
+4.2%
Primary Topics
ai-agents, cordis, dsh
agentic-ai, agents, ai
Choose deepseek-harness when...
- You work primarily in the TypeScript ecosystem
- You need ai-agents, cordis capabilities
- You value a large, active community (211.8k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+107.2% tracked growth)
Choose AutoGPT when...
- You work primarily in the Python ecosystem
- You need agentic-ai, agents capabilities
- You value a large, active community (187.1k+ stars)
- You prefer a project with proven momentum (+4.2% tracked growth)